AI governance / AI Governance Kits
ISO 42001 Gap Checklist for Small Teams
A simplified ISO 42001-oriented gap checklist for small teams that want to understand AI management-system expectations before formal certification work.
CHF 299
Who buys this
- AI governance owners
- operations teams
- SaaS founders
- risk managers
Deliverables
- AI management-system gap checklist
- Policy and role inventory
- Risk and impact assessment prompts
- Evidence readiness worksheet
Business outcomes
- Understand which AI management artifacts are missing
- Prioritize policy, role, risk, monitoring, and evidence gaps
- Prepare for future ISO 42001 conversations without starting from a blank page
What you receive
Included assets
- A simplified AI management-system gap checklist for small teams.
- Evidence prompts for policies, roles, inventory, risk, vendor review, monitoring, training, and management review.
- Prioritization guidance for what to fix before formal assurance work.
Example artifacts
- AI management-system gap checklist
- Evidence readiness worksheet
- Management review and improvement tracker
Buyer fit
Best for
- Small and mid-size companies exploring ISO 42001 or AI management-system expectations.
- SaaS and AI teams that need a practical self-assessment before certification vendors or consultants.
- Operations and governance owners building a roadmap from basic policy to repeatable AI governance.
Not for
- Companies that need a certifying body or legal opinion.
- Teams expecting this checklist alone to create ISO certification readiness.
- High-risk AI providers needing detailed technical assurance and legal review.
Decision support
The checklist helps teams decide whether their AI governance is at policy-only, operating baseline, or formal management-system readiness.
It is priced as a deeper governance artifact because it helps organize a certification-adjacent roadmap without requiring a first consulting call.
Proof points
- Converts AI management-system expectations into a small-team gap checklist.
- Links policy, roles, inventory, risk assessment, vendor review, monitoring, incident response, and management review.
- Helps teams decide whether they are ready for deeper consulting, certification, or internal governance work.
Preview
Gap area: AI policy exists, is approved, has an owner, covers employee use, vendor use, sensitive data, and review cadence.
Gap area: AI inventory records systems, owners, intended use, data categories, output use, vendor dependency, and review date.
Gap area: management review receives risks, incidents, exceptions, approvals, training status, and planned improvements.
Public sample
Understand AI management-system gaps before formal ISO 42001 certification, audit, or consulting work.
Gap area: AI policy exists, is approved, has an owner, covers employee use, vendor use, sensitive data, and review cadence.
Gap area: AI inventory records systems, owners, intended use, data categories, output use, vendor dependency, and review date.
Gap area: management review receives risks, incidents, exceptions, approvals, training status, and planned improvements.
Buyer FAQ
Does this certify us to ISO 42001?
No. It helps identify gaps before formal certification or assurance work.
Is this only for AI companies?
No. It is useful for companies that provide, buy, or use AI systems and want a structured management approach.